Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Core i5-3350P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1990 days newer than Core i5-3350P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3350P - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i5-3350P - 62 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-3350P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3350P
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3350P
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
583
44.811683320522675%
Multi-Core
1724
45.0718954248366%
Intel Core i5-3350P | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 69 W | TDP | 62 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
