Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1463 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-3340M - 257 vs 256 FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
