Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2519 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3340M - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 48 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1506.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |