Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 1583 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - €20.54 vs €40.13
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-3330 - €0.14 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |