Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1677 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 35 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3320M - 176 vs 153 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3320M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
