Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2282 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 33% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i5-3317U - 118 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 32 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3317U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
