Buy on Amazon
€313.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3210M - 246 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€313.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop-Prozessor, 10 Kerne bis zu 5,2 GHz, LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipsatz) 65 W
Buy for €313.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3210M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
