Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-2557M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2262 days newer than Core i5-2557M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2557M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2557M - 332 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2557M - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Single-Core
381
32.453151618398635%
Multi-Core
742
10.636467889908257%
Intel Core i5-2557M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |