Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-2550K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 952 days newer than Core i5-2550K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2550K
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2550K - 162 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2550K - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2550K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |