Buy on Amazon
€318.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-2540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3376 days newer than Core i5-2540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2540M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-2540M - 303 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2540M - 20 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
303
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€318.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2540M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2540M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-2540M or Core i9-10900KF
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
206 FPS
€24.29/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€5,003.16
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
