Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-2500S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2363 days newer than Core i5-2500S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-2500S - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500S - 64 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
110
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500S | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |