Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €35.61 vs €74.28
- Up to 10% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-10105F - €0.65 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 87% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-2500 - 103 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €35.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14316 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
90%
Price, €
€74.28
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |