Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 133 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2467M - 672 vs 668 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-2467M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
