Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i5-2410M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 818 days newer than Core i5-2410M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2410M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2410M - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2410M - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2410M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2410M | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
