Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 653 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - €29.22 vs €69.9
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2400S - €0.17 vs €0.42 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17324 minutes ago
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |