Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2203 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-8400 - 137 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - €177.5 vs €311.98
- Up to 36% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14600K - €1.47 vs €2.28 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
64%
Price, €
€311.98
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €311.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
121
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |