Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €268.83 vs €569.47
- Up to 52% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900F - €1.62 vs €3.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-14500 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14500 - 32 vs 20 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
166
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€268.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €268.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.41/FPS
47%
Price, €
€569.47
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €569.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14500 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |