Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 210 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 135 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
