Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-12400F - 193 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €131.91 vs €238.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13600KF - €0.71 vs €1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
57.258064516129025%
Price, €
€238.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €238.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
185
95.85492227979275%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€131.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €131.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
2191
79.75973789588642%
Multi-Core
8910
57.80084333441453%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |