Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100 - 132 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €128.17 vs €254.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13600KF - €1.23 vs €1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
63%
Price, €
€254.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €254.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
104
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |