Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400 - 185 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €108.52 vs €315.7
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-13600K - €0.67 vs €1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
39%
Price, €
€315.7
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €315.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
162
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |