Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10300 - 206 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €204.87 vs €309.62
- Up to 23% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13600K - €1.15 vs €1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
77%
Price, €
€309.62
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €309.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €204.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |