Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - 579 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €60.24 vs €289.23
- Up to 76% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-13600K - €0.12 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
24%
Price, €
€289.23
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €289.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |