Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 146 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €194.6 vs €1506.42
- Up to 88% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €1.33 vs €11.08 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 48 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €194.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
93%
Value, €/FPS
€11.08/FPS
12%
Price, €
€1506.42
12%
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |