Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 7% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €102.0 vs €206.33
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €206.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74832 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
180
93.26424870466322%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
51.333624836029735%
Multi-Core
6976
67.30991895021228%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |