Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G4900 - 467 vs 378 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - €60.24 vs €246.8
- Up to 70% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-12600KF - €0.16 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
467
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
30%
Price, €
€246.8
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
378
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |