Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 158% better in FIFA 23 than FX-4100 - 235 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - €19.39 vs €316.35
- Up to 84% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-12600 - €0.21 vs €1.35 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
15.555555555555554%
Price, €
€316.35
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €316.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2331 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
91
38.72340425531915%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |