Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €151.67 vs €630.9
- Up to 76% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-13900 - €0.63 vs €2.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-12400F - 241 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
239
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for €630.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |