Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-3770S - 217 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €113.29 vs €138.12
- Up to 8% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-12400F - €0.59 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
92%
Price, €
€138.12
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €138.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
193
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |