Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €182.81 vs €579.08
- Up to 62% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-13900F - €0.68 vs €1.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-12400 - 324 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
269
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
324
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
37%
Price, €
€579.08
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €579.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |