Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6800K - 658 vs 536 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €127.21 vs €169.95
- Up to 8% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400 - €0.24 vs €0.26 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €169.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13177 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
536
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |