Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €154.89 vs €697.38
- Up to 75% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900KS - €0.8 vs €3.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600KF - 218 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11052 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
25%
Price, €
€697.38
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €697.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |