Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 142 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €167.82 vs €2846.24
- Up to 94% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €1.18 vs €20.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 64 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €167.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
137
96%
Value, €/FPS
€20.78/FPS
5%
Price, €
€2846.24
5%
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |