Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Celeron G3930T - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €20.54 vs €210.77
- Up to 90% better value when playing Control than Core i5-11600K - €0.1 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16650 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |