Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 5900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 131 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 5900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - €208.77 vs €286.33
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - €1.02 vs €1.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Buy for €286.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |