Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-4300 - 231 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €29.22 vs €210.77
- Up to 82% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i5-11600K - €0.16 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
17%
Price, €
€210.77
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12799 minutes ago
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |