Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 49% better in Rust than FX-8120 - 228 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1638 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |