Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 81% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2320 - 446 vs 246 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2320 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2320 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - €28.13 vs €136.49
- Up to 65% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11500 - €0.11 vs €0.31 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
446
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
35%
Price, €
€136.49
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
246
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i5-2320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |