Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105F - 214 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - €70.56 vs €151.71
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11500 - €0.34 vs €0.71 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
47.88732394366198%
Price, €
€151.71
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58099 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
95.7943925233645%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
72.84569138276554%
Multi-Core
4472
60.23706896551724%
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |