Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3999 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-875K - 196 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
