Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3499 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 39% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8120 - 611 vs 441 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |