Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €101.9 vs €390.97
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-13700K - €0.48 vs €1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11400F - 229 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19071 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
28%
Price, €
€390.97
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |