Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2996 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3230M - 176 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3230M |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |