Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 80% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-2500K - 144 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €43.94 vs €104.05
- Up to 24% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-11400F - €0.55 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
76%
Price, €
€104.05
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €104.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
80
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |