Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-390M - 307 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €102.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-390M |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Arrandale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |