Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-3330 - 187 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €40.13 vs €113.77
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11400 - €0.25 vs €0.61 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
40%
Price, €
€113.77
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |