Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €113.77 vs €124.14
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-13100F - €0.97 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11400 - 123 vs 117 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
96%
Price, €
€124.14
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |