Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 4737 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 112% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 439 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
12.268041237113401%
Multi-Core
765
10.479452054794521%
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Agena |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
