Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2524 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-4670T - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €124.55 vs €288.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-4670T - €0.69 vs €1.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €124.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |