Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-3330 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €40.13 vs €124.55
- Up to 67% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10600KF - €0.19 vs €0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
33%
Price, €
€124.55
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |